DENTA Danish ENT Academy
Home
About DENTA
Past Events
Conferences
Pediatric ENT
Rhinology Symposium
Workshops
Ultrasound
Facial Trauma
Ultrasound UK 🇬🇧
Rhinology Symposium Evaluation form
Rhinology 2024 Evaluering CME
Evaluation Form
Rhinology Symposium 2024
Full name
Email
Profession
Doctor
Nurse
Other
Previous
Next
Please rate the
overall
aspects of the symposium
on the basis of:
Education content
Poor
Below average
Average
Above average
Outstanding
Relevance to practise
Poor
Below average
Average
Above average
Outstanding
Questions and discussions
Poor
Below average
Average
Above average
Outstanding
Oral presentations
Poor
Below average
Average
Above average
Outstanding
Quality of presenters
Poor
Below average
Average
Above average
Outstanding
Selection of topics
Poor
Below average
Average
Above average
Outstanding
Overall quality of activity
Poor
Below average
Average
Above average
Outstanding
Previous
Next
Please rate the venue
on the basis of:
Rooms for sessions
Poor
Below average
Average
Above average
Outstanding
Catering
Poor
Below average
Average
Above average
Outstanding
Entertainment
Poor
Below average
Average
Above average
Outstanding
How did you hear about the s
ymposium?
Checkbox Field
Online
E-mail
Word of mouth
Other
Do you have any other comments? Any feedback is appreciated!
Previous
Next
EACCME participant's evaluation form
1) Quality of the event
How useful for your professional activity did you find this event?
Not useful (1)
Fairly useful (2)
Useful (3)
Extremely useful (4)
If this activity was not useful, please explain why:
What was your overall impression of the event?
Very poor (1)
Poor (2)
Good (3)
Excellent (4)
What was the best aspect of this event?
What was the worst aspect of this event?
2) Relevance of the event
Did the event fulfil your educational goals and expected learning outcomes?
Not at all (1)
Not much (2)
Somewhat (3)
Very much (4)
Was the presented information well balanced and consistenly supported by a valid scientific evidence base?
Not at all (1)
Not much (2)
Somewhat (3)
Very much (4)
2.3) How useful to you personally was each session?
Session 1: Introductory Session – Nasal Surgery
Not useful (1)
Fairly useful (2)
Useful (3)
Extremely useful (4)
Session 2: Sinus Surgery
Not useful (1)
Fairly useful (2)
Useful (3)
Extremely useful (4)
Session 3: Inflammation
Not useful (1)
Fairly useful (2)
Useful (3)
Extremely useful (4)
Session 4: Tumours of the Nose: Benign and Malignant
Not useful (1)
Fairly useful (2)
Useful (3)
Extremely useful (4)
Session 5: Allergy
Not useful (1)
Fairly useful (2)
Useful (3)
Extremely useful (4)
Session 6: Facial Pain
Not useful (1)
Fairly useful (2)
Useful (3)
Extremely useful (4)
3) Suitability of formats used during the event
Was there adequate time available for discussions, questions & answers and learner engagement?
Never (1)
Only rarely (2)
Sometimes (3)
Always/almost always (4)
Can you indicate any innovative elements during the activity?
4) Ways the event affects clinical practice
Will the information you learnt be implemented in your practice?
Not at all (1)
Not much (2)
Somewhat (3)
Very much (4)
Can you provide ONE example how this event will influence your future practice?
5) Commercial bias
Did all the faculty members provide their potential conflicts of interest declaration with the sponsor(s) as a second slide of their presentation?
No (1)
Yes, but only a small part (2)
Yes, for the majority (3)
Yes, all (4)
Can you provide an example of biased presentation in this activity?
Do you agree that the information was overall free of commercial and other bias?
Strongly disagree (1)
Rather disagree (2)
Rather agree (3)
Strongly agree (4)
Previous
Submit Form
